56. While examining your client’s shipment of 1,000 handbags at the container examination station, CBP discovered that the goods bear a mark suspected of infringing a trademark associated with a well-known designer. The designer’s mark is registered on the Principal Register of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and recorded with CBP. The suspect mark is not identical with or substantially indistinguishable from the registered and recorded mark; rather, CBP determines that it copies or simulates the registered and recorded mark and, consequently, detains the handbags. Which of the following options is available to the importer to obtain relief from detention within 30 days?
A. The importer may remove or obliterate the suspect marks from the handbags in such a manner that they are incapable of being reconstituted
B. The importer may label the merchandise with the following statement: “This product is not a product authorized by the United States trademark owner for importation and is physically and materially different from the authorized product”
C. The importer may file a petition under 19 CFR pt. 171, persuasively arguing that the suspect marks do not actually so resemble the recorded mark as to be likely to confuse the public
D. The importer may claim the personal use exemption under 19 CFR 148.55
E. None of the above
[bg_collapse view=”button-green” color=”#4a4949″ icon=”arrow” expand_text=”Show Answer and Citation” collapse_text=”Hide Answer and Citation” ]
The Answer is: A
Citation: 19 CFR 133.22 (c)(1), 19 CFR 133.23(a)(3), 19 CFR 171, 19 CFR 148.55
[/bg_collapse]